Frequently asked questions
Drupal has a long-standing security track record and a dedicated Security Team that manages vulnerability disclosure and patching, which is a significant reason it's the CMS of choice across governments globally (Australia's GovCMS, Government of Canada, and others). Security outcomes still depend heavily on keeping core and contributed modules patched and following secure coding practices for any custom development, the platform provides a strong foundation, not a guarantee independent of good operational practice.
Outdated core/module versions (unpatched known vulnerabilities), poorly reviewed custom code, misconfigured permissions, and weak monitoring/incident response processes; most publicly known Drupal security incidents trace back to sites that hadn't applied available security patches, not to undiscovered platform flaws.
GovCMS SaaS applies security patches and infrastructure hardening centrally across all sites on the shared platform, reducing the burden on individual agencies; GovCMS PaaS and self-hosted Drupal put more of that patching and hardening responsibility on the agency or its support provider, making an active support and maintenance arrangement essential in those models.
Insights